Section 077 · Chapter 10, Anti-Patterns That Create False Confidence

Anti-Patterns: The One-Run Demo Fallacy

A beautiful demo proves what the system can do once, not what it will do reliably.

RAGone-run demodemo fallacy

What to do

  1. Use fixed prompts, documented model settings, versioned tools, recorded traces, and enough samples to estimate behavior.
  2. Define runnable checks that exercise RAG, one-run demo, and demo fallacy.
  3. Set acceptable outcomes and blocker failures for RAG, one-run demo, and demo fallacy before running the evaluation.

Evidence to preserve

  • Preserve the inputs, versions, configurations, raw outcomes, and results for RAG, one-run demo, demo fallacy needed to reproduce work on Anti-Patterns: The One-Run Demo Fallacy.
  • Report results for RAG, one-run demo, demo fallacy by relevant slice, separate blocker failures from averages, state uncertainty and blind spots, and connect the result to a release decision.

Expert note

When the system matters, separate capability demos, smoke tests, benchmark runs, and release evals. A demo can inspire investment, but only repeated, sampled, versioned evidence should support shipping.

Continue the conversation

Apply this to your context.

Save your product context once, then open a focused conversation that combines it with this concept.

Cite this page

Jason Arbon. "Anti-Patterns: The One-Run Demo Fallacy." Testing AI Knowledge Edition, section 77.

https://jarbon.ai/testing-ai/knowledge/ch077-demo-fallacy.html

Shared across the Knowledge Edition

Adapt every concept to your world.

Describe your product, role, users, risks, constraints, or current quality problem. This stays in this browser until you choose to send it to ChatGPT.

Saved only in this browser.0 / 2400